For a posterior vital molar with a core, what is the best material to restore it?

When restoring a posterior vital molar with a core, amalgam is often considered the best material due to several key properties that align with the requirements for this type of restoration. Amalgam is renowned for its strength and durability, making it particularly suitable for the high-cario-susceptibility areas of posterior teeth that experience significant occlusal forces.

Additionally, amalgam has a long history of use in dental restorative practices, demonstrating excellent wear resistance and the ability to withstand the functional stresses associated with chewing. Its handling properties allow for effective placement in the complex anatomy of molars, which can often pose challenges during restoration.

Moreover, amalgam's thermal conductivity helps to mitigate discomfort for the patient if the tooth had been previously compromised or if there is any residual sensitivity. It bonds mechanically to the dental structure, which further enhances its retention compared to some other materials in specific clinical situations.

Composite resin, while aesthetically pleasing and providing good adaptation to tooth structure, may not always provide the same level of durability and may require more frequent replacements in posterior teeth under heavy occlusal forces. Glass ionomer cements, while useful in certain situations, generally lack the strength needed for high-load-bearing restorations like those found in molars. Therefore,